ISSN 2663-1636 ( ) ISSN 2663-1644 (o) . , 2019, . 3(36) 247 The model of building of information security system of the enterprise is presented and the basic models of the organization of cybersecurity are analyzed. Methodical approaches are offered, which allow to fully analyze and formulate requirements related to ensuring information security of the enterprise; avoid the expense of unnecessary security measures that are possible in subjective risk assessment; to assist in the planning and implementation of protection at all stages of the life cycle of the enterprise information system; provide justification for the choice of counteraction means; evaluate performance and compare different countermeasures. In general, a methodical approach to modeling information security and cyber security was considered allows to evaluate or overestimate the level of the current state of information security of information flows of the enterprise, to make recommendations for ensuring information security of the enterprise, reduce the potential costs of the enterprise by increasing the stability of the information flow system, to develop the concept and policy of information and cyber security of the enterprise. information provision, cyber security, information and communication technologies (ICT), information technologies (IT), model (Received) 03.09.2019 (Reviewed) 16.12.2019 (Approved) 23.12.2019 354.35 JEL CLassification: D81, I23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32515/2663-1636.2019.3(36).247-254 . . , . , , . , . , ’ . , , . , , , , , . . , . , , . , . , . , , , , , , , ___________ © . . , 2019 ISSN 2663-1636 ( ) ISSN 2663-1644 (o) . , 2019, . 3(36) 248 . , . , , , ’ . . , [2]. , , . , , . . . , , , , . . , . . [9], . . , . . [8], . . , . . [1], . ( . Vishwanath), . (D. Kaufmann) [15], . (R. Bushman) . (A. Smith) [10], . , . . , . . , . . [11], . (A. Williams) [16], . ( . Kundeliene), . (S. Leitoniene) [12], C. (C. Stohl), . (M. Stohl), . (P. Leonard) [14] , , , . , – . . , , . . « » [5] ( 79). , , , , , . , , . , ’ [1]. . Webometrics, - - [8, 13]. 2004 . – , - . , , , . ISSN 2663-1636 ( ) ISSN 2663-1644 (o) . , 2019, . 3(36) 249 , , , , . , , Webometrics . . , . [15] , ( , ), ( , ), ( ), ( , , , ). [12, 14] ’ . , , , . , , , ’ . , , . – , . [10] , , , , . " " " " , CEDOS . [4, 9]: 1) (10%) – , « » ; 2) (24%) – , , , ; 3) (10%); 4) (40%) – , , , , ; 5) (8%) – , ; 6) (8%) – , . [7]. : , , , ISSN 2663-1636 ( ) ISSN 2663-1644 (o) . , 2019, . 3(36) 250 , , . , , . , . [6]. . , , , , . 40%, . , , , , . « » [3]. , Beyond Business ( ). , , : – ; – , , , ; – , ; – - , , . , . [16] – , , , , . , ’ , . , , , , , . , ’ , , . , . , , , , , , , ’ ’ , ISSN 2663-1636 ( ) ISSN 2663-1644 (o) . , 2019, . 3(36) 251 . ’ [11]: ; ; ; ; ’ ; ; - ; ; - . : , (V); ( ) , (OP); ( ), (KR); , , (KO); , (FD); ( , ), (ZO); ( , ), (NO); , , (Z); - , (PRV); - , , (PS); ( , , ’ ), (KM); , (KI). , , , , (t). , : < V, OP, KR, KO, FD, ZO, NO, Z, PRV, PS, KM, KI, t >. . , : , ; , - , . , , , , , . , ISSN 2663-1636 ( ) ISSN 2663-1644 (o) . , 2019, . 3(36) 252 . , . 1. . ., . ., . . - . - . 2016. . 2. . 59–75. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/oeeemu_2016_2_7. 2. . ., . . . . 2013. 1. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efek_2013_1_47. 3. – 2017 / : ., ., . .: « », 2018. 28 . 4. 2016 / CEDOS – . URL: http://cedos.org.ua/uk/ranking-16. 5. : 01.07.2014 1556-VII 05.01.2017 .: URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18. 6. - / . URL: https://irrp.org.ua/rezultaty-monitoryngu-vidkrytosti. 7. / . URL: https://cedos.org.ua/ckeditor_assets/attachments/ranking/zvit.pdf. 8. . ., . . . . 2013. . 38, . 6. . 234–244. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ITZN_2013_38_6_22. 9. . ., . . . " ". : . 2016. . 44. . 144–152. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vzuk_2016_44_21. 10. Bushman R.M., Smith A.J. Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Financial Accounting Information, and Corporate Governance. Economic Policy Review 9.1. 2003. . 65–87. 11. Kucherova H., Didenko A., Kravets O. Modeling information transparency of economic entities under uncertainty. In 2019 7th International Conference on Modeling, Development and Strategic Management of Economic System (MDSMES 2019). Atlantis Press. URL: https://doi.org/10.2991/mdsmes- 19.2019.38. 12. Kundeliene K., Leitoniene S. Business Information Transparency: Causes and Evaluation Possibilities, Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Vol. 213. P. 340–344. 13. Methodology | Ranking Web of Universities. URL: http://www.webometrics.info/en/Methodology. 14. Stohl C., Stohl M., Leonard P. Managing Opacity: Information Visibility and the Paradox of Transparency in the Digital Age. International Journal of Communication. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 123–137. 15. Vishwanath T., Kaufmann D. Toward transparency: New approaches and their application to financial markets. World Bank Research Observer. 2001. 16: . 41–57. 16. Williams A. A global index of information transparency and accountability. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2014. Vol. 43. P. 804–824. References 1. Buinits'ka, O.P., Stepura .S., & Sm rnova V.A. (2016). Vebometrichnii reiting yak nstrument ots nyuvannya yakost v dkritogo osv tn'ogo e-seredovishcha un versitetu [Webometric rating as a tool for evaluating the quality of the university's open e-learning environment]. V dkrite osv tne e-seredovishche suchasnogo un versitetu – The open e-learning environment of the modern university, 2, 59–75. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/oeeemu_2016_2_7 [in Ukrainian]. 2. Zabarna, E.M., & Solov'eva, E.Yu. (2013). Sistema ta kriter marketingovogo anal zu sait v vishchikh navchal'nikh zaklad v [System and criteria for marketing analysis of higher education institution sites]. Efektivna ekonom ka – An efficient economy, 1. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efek_2013_1_47 [in Ukrainian]. ISSN 2663-1636 ( ) ISSN 2663-1644 (o) . , 2019, . 3(36) 253 3. Z nchenko, A., Rezn k, N., & Saprik na, M. (2017). ndeks prozorost sait v ukra ns'kikh kompan i [Ukrainian companies' site transparency index]. Ki v: Vidavnitstvo «Yuston» [in Ukrainian]. 4. Mon toring prozorost nats onal'nikh VNZ 2016 [Transparency monitoring of national universities in 2016]. cedos.org.ua. Retrieved from http://cedos.org.ua/uk/ranking-16 [in Ukrainian]. 5. Pro vishchu osv tu: Zakon Ukra ni v d 01.07.2014 1556-VII v redakts v d 05.01.2017 r. [On Higher Education: Law of Ukraine from 01.07.2014 1556-VII as of 05/01/2017]. zakon2.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18 [in Ukrainian]. 6. Rezul'tati mon toringu v dkritost veb-sait v vishchikh navchal'nikh zaklad v Ukra ni [Results of monitoring the openness of websites of higher education institutions of Ukraine]. nstitut rozvitku reg onal'no presi. irrp.org.ua. Retrieved from https://irrp.org.ua/rezultaty-monitoryngu-vidkrytosti [in Ukrainian]. 7. Reiting prozorost nats onal'nikh VNZ [Transparency rating of national universities]. Tsentr dosl dzhennya susp l'stva. cedos.org.ua. Retrieved from https://cedos.org.ua/ckeditor_assets/attachments/ranking/zvit.pdf [in Ukrainian]. 8. Tyutyunnik, A.V., & Gritselyak, B. . (2013). Osnovn kriter ta pokazniki vebometrichnogo reitingu un versitet v sv tu [The main criteria and indicators of web rankings of universities in the world]. nformats in tekhnolog zasobi navchannya – Information technology and training tools, 6, 234–244. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ITZN_2013_38_6_22 [in Ukrainian]. 9. Cherevko, O.V., & Radz khovs'ka, Yu.M. (2016). Vpliv nformats ino prozorost VNZ na khnyu ekonom chnu bezpeku [Impact of information transparency of universities on their economic security]. Vchen zapiski un versitetu "KROK". Ser ya : Ekonom ka – Academic notes from KROK University. Series: Economics, 44, 144–152 [in Ukrainian]. 10. Bushman, Robert M., & Smith, Abbie J. (2003). Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Financial Accounting Information, and Corporate Governance. Economic Policy Review 9.1, 65-87 [in English]. 11. Kucherova, H., Didenko, A., & Kravets, O. (2019, October). Modeling information transparency of economic entities under uncertainty: 7th International Conference on Modeling, Development and Strategic Management of Economic System (MDSMES 2019). Atlantis Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2991/mdsmes-19.2019.38 [in English]. 12. Kundeliene, K., & Leitoniene, S. (2015). Business Information Transparency: Causes and Evaluation Possibilities. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 340–344 [in English]. 13. Methodology. Ranking Web of Universities. webometrics.info. Retrieved from http://www.webometrics.info/en/Methodology [in English]. 14. Stohl, C., Stohl, M., & Leonard, P. (2016). Managing Opacity: Information Visibility and the Paradox of Transparency in the Digital Age. International Journal of Communication, 10, 123–137 [in English]. 15. Vishwanath, T., & Kaufmann, D. (2001). Toward transparency: New approaches and their application to financial markets. World Bank Research Observer, 16, 41–57 [in English]. 16. Williams, A. (2014). A global index of information transparency and accountability. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43, 804–824 [in English]. Yuliia Honcharenko Classic Private University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine Conceptual Provisions on Parameterization of Information Transparency in the Tasks of Evaluating and Optimizing the Website of a Higher Education Institution The article substantiates the need to increase the level of information transparency of higher education institutions' websites as a mechanism for ensuring the competitiveness of an educational institution in the educational services market. It is through the site that educational institutions demonstrate a competitive advantage to their consumers, serve as a source of information when choosing a higher education institution and a future specialty for entrants. The parameters and criteria by which the level of information transparency is diagnosed have been studied in the works of many domestic and foreign scientists. However, the question remains - which set of parameters most fully and adequately reflects the information transparency of the website. The purpose of the article is to study the factors, criteria for measuring transparency, to determine the main parameters for assessing the transparency of the website of a higher education institution. The best known rating systems for evaluating higher education institutions, including the factors and criteria for measuring transparency in each rating, are highlighted and analyzed in the paper. There are differences between the concepts of visibility and transparency, the complex relationship between them. It was noted that criteria of information transparency should be related to corporate culture, social responsibility, degree ISSN 2663-1636 ( ) ISSN 2663-1644 (o) . , 2019, . 3(36) 254 of trust in the source of information, degree of responsibility of the economic entity, level of development of information technologies, level of information and communication security. We propose our own set of criteria that reflect the activities of higher education institutions in terms of information transparency of their sites. Website transparency performance metrics. The optimal level of each of the parameters should satisfy all information needs of stakeholders, able to guarantee a positive economic effect and no negative consequences for the institution. information transparency, higher education institution website, visibility, transparency criteria, educational ratings, transparency efficiency (Received) 10.12.2019 (Reviewed) 20.12.2019 (Approved) 23.12.2019