Кафедра аудиту, обліку та оподаткування
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kntu.kr.ua/handle/123456789/11014
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Методологія, методика, метод: сутність понять та особливості їх прояву у сфері податкового планування, аналізу та аудиту(Гельветика, 2023) Лисенко, А. М.; Акімов, С. С.; Чадай, Ю. В.; Lysenko, A.; Akimov, S.; Chadai, Yu.В роботі досліджено сучасні наукові підходи до трактування сутності понять «методологія», «методика», «метод», а також особливості їх прояву в сфері податкового планування, аналізу та аудиту. Автори розглянули методологію як багаторівневе утворення, що формується із сукупності пов’язаних між собою та ієрархічно підпорядкованих складових компонентів, виокремили у її складі закони та основні категорії діалектики, загальнонаукові принципи та методи дослідження, методи досліджень, використовувані у міждисциплінарних рамках та у межах вивчення конкретних дисциплін, закони й категорії окремих наук. У методології податкового планування, аналізу та аудиту запропоновано виокремлювати загальну, спеціальну та приватну складові. Також автори систематизували компоненти методики та узагальнили сфери використання методів податкового планування, аналізу та аудиту. The work examines modern scientific approaches to the interpretation of the essence of the concept of "methodology", "methodology", "method", as well as the peculiarities of their manifestation in the field of tax planning, analysis and audit. The authors considered the methodology as a multi-level entity formed from a set of interrelated and hierarchically subordinate components (general scientific methodology based on a combination of philosophy and scientific concept; interdisciplinary methodologies that combine certain fields of knowledge; sectored and disciplinary methodologies, the components of which there are, in particular, the methodologies of tax planning, analysis, and auditing), identified in its composition the laws and main categories of dialectics, general scientific principles and research methods, research methods used in interdisciplinary frameworks and within the study of specific disciplines, laws and categories of individual sciences. It is proposed to define methodology as a systematized set of ideas regarding the use of certain methods within a certain scientific approach, and methodology as a description of the research process itself using various methods (techniques, methods) of research, as well as an established sequence of rules and tools. In the methodology of tax planning, analysis and audit, it is proposed to distinguish a general component (which defines a philosophical approach to understanding the processes and phenomena occurring in the environment, the place and role of tax planning, analysis and audit in it), a special component (principles) and a private component (methods and techniques). The authors singled out the generalized components of the research methodology in the field of tax planning, analysis and audit (formulation of the purpose and tasks of the research; definition of the object, subject of the research, development of indicators; composition of the information base; selection of research methods (techniques, methods); implementation of analytical and audit procedures, planning and forecasting calculations; development of final documentation, interpretation of results, formulation of conclusions; control over the implementation of results), systematized the components of the methodology and summarized the areas of use of tax planning, analysis and audit methods.Item Technology for the Substantiation of Main Principles and Approaches to the Formation and Evaluation of Information Supporting System about Company`s Tax Capacity(University of Economic, 2020) Kuzmenko, H.; Shalimova, N.; Lysenko, A.; Кузьменко, Г. І.; Шалімова, Н. С.; Лисенко, А. М.Using of the new technology for principles of forming the system of information about tax capacity are grouped and the directions of activity of the enterprise are identified, in view of which it is expedient to establish criteria for assessing its efficiency. The lists of basic principles (unity, objectivity, competence, probability and periodicity) and additional principles (dynamism, rationality, conformity, control) have been substantiated. The system of indicators and criteria of the formalized expression of efficiency is offered. The list of indicators made it possible to build the system (vector) of criteria requirements to ensure the effectiveness of information about the tax capacity of a business entity.Item Information Supporting System about Tax Capacity of a Company and its Efficiency: Principles of Formation and Evaluation(The Baltic Scientific Journals, 2020) Kuzmenko, H.; Shalimova, N.; Lysenko, A.; Кузьменко, Г. І.; Шалімова, Н. С.; Лисенко, А. М.; Кузьменко, Г. И.; Шалимова, Н. С.; Лысенко, А. Н.The principles of forming the system of information about tax capacity are grouped and the directions of activity of the enterprise are identified, in view of which it is expedient to establish criteria for assessing its efficiency. The formation of information about tax capacity of an enterprise should occur not chaotically, but according to certain principles. The lists of basic principles (unity, objectivity, competence, probability and periodicity) and additional principles (dynamism, rationality, conformity, control) have been substantiated. The system of indicators and criteria of the formalized expression of efficiency is offered. The list of indicators made it possible to build the system (vector) of criteria requirements to ensure the effectiveness of information about the tax capacity of a business entity. It has been proved that in assessing the effectiveness of the information supporting system on tax capacity of the entity, the impact of time and cost criteria, as well as other non-measurable parameters should be taken into account. The proposed approach to assessing the effectiveness of the current information supporting system on the taxpayer's capacity will allow assessing alternative information systems in terms of the effectiveness of their implementation.