Економічний факультет
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kntu.kr.ua/handle/123456789/762
Browse
5 results
Search Results
Item Using Doing Business Rating for Assessing the Preconditions of Sustainable Transport and Environmental Economic Development(Batumi Navigation Teaching University, 2021) Kuzmenko, H.; Shalimova, N.; Shalimov, V.; Кузьменко, Г. І.; Шалімова, Н. С.; Шалімов, В. В.The possibilities of Doing Business rating for assessing the preconditions of sustainable transport and environmental economic development have been presented.Item International Rating “Benchmarking Public Procurement” and Its Using in the Context of Increasing the Effectiveness of the Functioning of Innovative-Integrated Structures in a Digital Economy(ЦНТУ, 2020) Shalimova, N.; Kuzmenko, H.; Шалимова, Н. С.; Кузьменко, Г. І.The methodologies of the World Bank's Benchmarking Public Procurement system are analyzed. The possibilities of Benchmarking Public Procurement in the context of evaluation the effectiveness of the functioning of innovative-integrated structures in a digital economy are considered. A results of comparative analysis of the Ukraine’s place among other countries of the world, in particular among the group of countries of Europe and Central Asia and among some OECD countries, which are considered as a group of high-income countries, has been presented.Item International rating system “Benchmarking Public Procurement”: possibilities of using in formation of digital infrastructure in the accounting and financial sectors(Baku Business University, 2020) Shalimova, N.; Kuzmenko, H.; Шалімова, Н. С.; Кузьменко, Г. І.Taking into account that an important role the digital environment plays in the sphere of spending public money and public procurement, the purpose of the article is to study the methodology of assessing the effectiveness of the public procurement system by World Bank in order to determinate possibilities of its using in formation of digital infrastructure in the accounting and financial sectors. The methodologies of the World Bank's Benchmarking Public Procurement system are investigated. A comparative analysis of the Ukraine’s place among other countries of the world, in particular among the group of countries of Europe and Central Asia and among some OECD countries, which are considered as a group of high-income countries, has been conducted. It is substantiated that the results of such comparative analysis will allow identifying risk areas, and relevant information can be used in developing recommendations and proposals for improving the effectiveness of the public procurement system. As a prospects for further researches the study of second-tier indicators and the methodology of evaluating the public procurement systems by the World Bank, taking into account its relatively short setbacks compared to other ratings, have been identified.Item Benchmarking Public Procurement as an International Rating System for Evaluation the Effectiveness of Public Procurement System of the Countries(2020) Shalimova, N.; Kuzmenko, H.; Шалімова, Н. С.; Кузьменко, Г. І.The purpose of the article is to study the methodology of assessing the effectiveness of the public procurement system by World Bank, to conduct a comparative analysis of Ukraine's place among other countries in the world. Taking into account the globalization of the economy and the intensification of European integration processes, it has been proved that an important part of evaluating the effectiveness of public procurement should be a comparative analysis of the implementation procedures with the relevant systems of other countries of the world. The methodologies of the World Bank's Benchmarking Public Procurement system are investigated. A comparative analysis of the Ukraine’s place among other countries of the world, in particular among the group of countries of Europe and Central Asia, as well as with some OECD countries, which are considered as a group of high-income countries, has been conducted. Taking into account that the World Bank reports do not have a final score and a final rating, it has been justified the feasibility of comparing by the general amount of points. It is substantiated that the results of such comparative analysis will allow identifying risk areas, and relevant information can be used in developing of recommendations and proposals for improving the effectiveness of the public procurement system, especially in the context of reforming the law on public procurement and the introduction of the new system "Prozorro". As a prospects for further researches the study of second-tier indicators and the methodology of evaluating the public procurement systems by the World Bank, taking into account its relatively short setbacks compared to other ratings, have been identified.Item Міжнародний рейтинг ефективності системи публічних закупівель («benchmarking public procurement») та його використання в державному аудиті(ПДАБА, 2011) Шалімова, Н. С.; Shalimova, N.Обґрунтовано, що підсумком державного фінансового контролю у формі аудиту, перевірки, моніторингу має стати не лише оцінка продуктивності та економності публічних закупівель, а й визначення ефективності та результативності процедур публічних закупівель. Враховуючи глобалізацію економіки та активізацію євроінтеграційних процесів доведено, що важливою складовою оцінки ефективності публічних закупівель має стати порівняльний аналіз процедур їх виконання з відповідними системами інших країн світу. Досліджено методики оцінки ефективності системи публічних закупівель («Benchmarking Public Procurement») Світового Банку. Проведено порівняльний аналіз місця України серед інших країн світу, зокрема, серед групи країн Європи та Центральної Азії, а також з окремими країнами ОЕСР, які віднесені до групи країн з високим рівнем доходу. Враховуючи те, що в звітах Світового Банку відсутня підсумкова оцінка та підсумковий рейтинг, обґрунтовано доцільність здійснення порівняння за сумою балів. Обґрунтовано, що результати такого порівняльного аналізу дозволять виявляти зони ризику, а відповідна інформація може бути використана при розробці рекомендацій та пропозицій щодо підвищення ефективності системи публічних закупівель особливо в умовах реформування законодавства про публічні закупівлі та запровадження нової системи «Прозорро» («Prozorro»). Перспективами подальших досліджень визначено дослідження показників другого рівня та методології оцінювання систем публічних закупівель Світового банку, враховуючи її нетривалий час застування у порівнянні з іншими рейтингами. It is substantiated that the results of state financial control in the form of audit, inspection, monitoring should be not only the evaluation of efficiency and economy of public procurement, but also determination of effectiveness and resultiveness of public procurement procedures. Taking into account the globalization of the economy and the intensification of European integration processes, it has been proved that an important part of evaluating the effectiveness of public procurement should be a comparative analysis of the implementation procedures with the relevant systems of other countries of the world. The methodologies of the World Bank's Benchmarking Public Procurement system are investigated. A comparative analysis of the Uktaine`s place among other countries of the world, in particular among the group of countries of Europe and Central Asia, as well as with some OECD countries, which are considered as a group of high-income countries, has been conducted. Taking into account that the World Bank reports do not have a final score and a final rating,it has been justified the feasibility of comparing by the general amount of points. It is substantiated that the results of such comparative analysis will allow to identify risk areas, and relevant information can be used in developing of recommendations and proposals for improving the effectiveness of the public procurement system, especially in the context of reforming the law on public procurement and the introduction of the new system "Prozorro". As a prospects for further researches the study of second-tier indicators and the methodology of evaluating the public procurement systems by the World Bank, taking into account its relatively short setbacks compared to other ratings, have been identified.